The late
Grammy-winning American stand-up comedian, actor, author, and
philosopher, George Calin once said, “never underestimate the power
of 'stupid' people in large groups.” I am sure Mr. Calin could have witnessed an incident or occasion that made him utter these
sentiments.
The
famed quote materialized into my psyche when part of the crowd that
gathered at Nelson Mandela's memorial service held at FNB stadium in
Johannesburg to pay their last respects to a leader who
curbed them from apartheid, booed and scoffed off their leader
President Jacob Zuma in his own country and in front of a global
television audience let alone in the presence of world’s most
powerful leaders.
I
am not labeling whoever contributed to the booing of Zuma a stupid
because that would be out of context, but i rather envied to feature
this quote with regards to how influential a large group can be
irrespective of what names we call them.
One would say the jeering and that kind of “mental attitude” exhibited by South Africans who thronged at this renowned event, which is thought to be the largest since Winston Churchill's 1965 state funeral, was ill-timed and uncalled for.
I
beg to differ with anyone whose line of thinking rests in the above
sentiments taking into consideration quite a number of aspects that
materialised the kind of embarrassment President Zuma encountered on
a day that he was meant to boost the his party's (ANC) political mileage ahead of the country's general elections in the coming six months.
The aggressive reception granted Mr Zuma is a clear reflection that South Africans had always wanted an opportunity where they would clearly tell their leader there were not a happy people hence they had to capitalise on that illustrious event.
The aggressive reception granted Mr Zuma is a clear reflection that South Africans had always wanted an opportunity where they would clearly tell their leader there were not a happy people hence they had to capitalise on that illustrious event.
Mandela’s
passing on came so soon after contentions such as Nkandla and the
government’s refusal to shift on the broadly rejected e-toll
payment strategy for upgrades to Gauteng’s highway system.
While
this was the first international event at which Mr Zuma was booed, it
is not the first time South Africans have called for him to be
recalled from his post. The Democratic Alliance threatened to call
for Mr Zuma’s impeachment after the Mail & Guardian printed
extracts from Public Protector Thuli Madonsela’s draft report on
the Nkandla saga. Ms Madonsela tentatively found Mr Zuma had misled
Parliament and profited considerably from about R20m worth of work
that had nothing to do with security features at his home, including
a swimming pool.
The
crucial aspect to note about yesterday is how representative were the
people who booed? If they did represent the view of many, then the
message is that its high time the president should practice self
introspection, not that citizens must behave in a way the elite
group wants tantamount to what happens in other countries where the credibility of a leader is is not directly questioned but rather the masses hide behind the media
for fear of being silenced.
Its
common knowledge that Mandela had carefully managed the anger and
frustration of the oppressor and the oppressed in South Africa’s
transition to democracy. He had also never hesitated to speak his
mind, no matter who he was speaking to, or how uncomfortable his
words may have been to his listener. It is in line with this
background that part of the crowd that gathered on that day did not
hesitate to speak their mind to their president whom they have many a
times accused of corruption and poor administration.
Mr.
Zuma was wrong if he took his people for granted, not to mention
undermining them and tag them a 'stupid' people because such cannot
happen in a country like South Africa where civilians are not afraid
to independently express their feelings to anyone despite their race,
political affiliation, gender you name it.
Lets not forget that this is also election season and people would believe that (the memorial) is a platform to express themselves and to say that everyone who behaved in that manner should be ignored is a huge mistake.
Lets not forget that this is also election season and people would believe that (the memorial) is a platform to express themselves and to say that everyone who behaved in that manner should be ignored is a huge mistake.
Democracy
is a system of rules in which, if masses want to boo a sitting
president at a memorial, they can freely do that without interference
and this is what happened to Zuma yesterday in sharp contrast to the
cheers that greeted his predecessor, Thabo Mbeki, and the vast cheers
for US President Barack Obama, Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe and
even for former apartheid president FW de Klerk.
People
cannot celebrate Madiba's contribution to achieving democracy and at
the same time scold people for exercising the rights which democracy
brings. That day was a warning for Zuma to act up and put his house
in order, the crowd spoke and that was something one should not
ignore hence he (Zuma) should walk the talk.
Presidential
Spokesperson Mac Maharaj shrugged
off the booing and maintained that Zuma
remained a popular leader. He
might have wanted to dampen the humiliation by saying, "It
passed – in four minutes it was over, and it didn't happen again,"
and that "we will not take a small event and make it into a
crisis in our democracy," but the fact is that his
boss and the world over realised that his (Zuma's) popularity was
fast becoming a history let alone loosing credibility in the
country's politics.
Twitter handle: @AnoShumba
No comments:
Post a Comment